On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:05:21PM -0400, George Spelvin wrote: > I'm currently running with two ext4 patches: > > Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> > Date: Sun Oct 7 22:18:56 2012 -0400 > Subject: ext4: fix metadata checksum calculation for the superblock > > Author: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed Oct 17 12:51:30 2012 -0700 > Subject: ext4: Don't verify checksums of dx non-leaf nodes during fallback linear scan > > They appear to fix real problems. I notice, that neither of these have > made it into 2.6.5. Should they be sent to -stable at some point? > > I'm not trying to overrule your judgements on the matter, just ensure that > the omission is actually a conscious decision rather than an oversight. <shrug> I was wondering too, but I figured Ted was probably busy dealing with the corruption bug and such. (Which itself doesn't seem to be in 3.6.x yet) I suppose it's a good sign that it's been more than a week and you haven't hit anything else... --D > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
