Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 22:21:09 +0100
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Emacs: a Lisp interpreter masquerading as ... a Lisp interpreter!
In-reply-to: <508C4FE5.1030102@redhat.com> (Eric Sandeen's message of "Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:19:33 -0500")
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux)

On 27 Oct 2012, Eric Sandeen verbalised:
> That's what we needed.  Woulda been great a few days ago ;)

*wince* sorry!

-- 
NULL && (void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  - From: Eric Sandeen

References:
- Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  - From: Nix
- Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  - From: Eric Sandeen
- Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  - From: Nix
- Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  - From: Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  - From: Nix
- Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  - From: Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  - From: Nix
- Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  - From: Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  - From: Nix
- Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  - From: Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  - From: Nix
- Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  - From: Eric Sandeen

Prev by Date: Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
Next by Date: Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
Previous by thread: Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
Next by thread: Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]