On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:07:34PM +0800, zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add a /sys/kernel/debug/hot_track/<device_name>/ directory for each
>> volume that contains two files. The first, `inode_data', contains the
>> heat information for inodes that have been brought into the hot data map
>> structures. The second, `range_data', contains similar information for
>> subfile ranges.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/hot_tracking.c | 462 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> fs/hot_tracking.h | 43 +++++
>> 2 files changed, 505 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> .....
>> +static int hot_debugfs_copy(struct debugfs_vol_data *data, char *msg, int len)
>> +{
>> + struct lstring *debugfs_log = data->debugfs_log;
>> + uint new_log_alloc_size;
>> + char *new_log;
>> + static char err_msg[] = "No more memory!\n";
>> +
>> + if (len >= data->log_alloc_size - debugfs_log->len) {
> ......
>> + }
>> +
>> + memcpy(debugfs_log->str + debugfs_log->len, data->log_work_buff, len);
>> + debugfs_log->len += (unsigned long) len;
>> +
>> + return len;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Returns the number of bytes written to the log. */
>> +static int hot_debugfs_log(struct debugfs_vol_data *data, const char *fmt, ...)
>> +{
>> + struct lstring *debugfs_log = data->debugfs_log;
>> + va_list args;
>> + int len;
>> + static char trunc_msg[] =
>> + "The next message has been truncated.\n";
>> +
>> + if (debugfs_log->str == NULL)
>> + return -1;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&data->log_lock);
>> +
>> + va_start(args, fmt);
>> + len = vsnprintf(data->log_work_buff,
>> + sizeof(data->log_work_buff), fmt, args);
>> + va_end(args);
>> +
>> + if (len >= sizeof(data->log_work_buff)) {
>> + hot_debugfs_copy(data, trunc_msg, sizeof(trunc_msg));
>> + }
>> +
>> + len = hot_debugfs_copy(data, data->log_work_buff, len);
>> + spin_unlock(&data->log_lock);
>> +
>> + return len;
>> +}
>
> Aren't you just recreating seq_printf() here? i.e. can't you replace
> all this complexity with generic seq_file/seq_operations constructs?
It seems to be a good suggestion, let me try it. thanks.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Regards,
Zhi Yong Wu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
