On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 09:12:15AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:25:39PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > > I run xfstests to do some tests, and I got an error from xfstests # > > 255. The failure reason is that block-based file in ext4 cannot > > support fallocate(2) to allocate an unwritten blocks. I am not sure > > whether we should change # 255 in xfstests or not. So Cc' to Dave > > Chinner to get some feedbacks. > > Zheng, > > I gave these patches a quick try and I'm seeing many more failures > than just test #255. Tests 75, 91, 112, 215, and 263 are also > failing, and I don't think it's all due to punch being supported w/o > fallocate support. Hi Ted, Thanks for sharing this information with me. I will look at these patches after patch series of extent status tree gets stable and submit to the mailing list. Regards, Zheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
