Re: [PATCH next/mmotm] ext4: fix cache_es after merge_left

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 04:39:20PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:31:28PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Kernel build with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB or CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG slub_debug=FPZ
> > gives me kernel BUG at fs/ext4/extents_status.c:142!  That's the
> > BUG_ON(es->start + es->len < es->start) in extent_status_end() called
> > from ext4_es_insert_extent().  tree->cache_es has been freed and poisoned.
> > 
> > This comes from when ext4_es_try_to_merge_left() merges es into leftward
> > es1, but ext4_es_insert_extent()'s out then updates cache_es to the freed
> > extent_status.  ext4_es_try_to_merge_right() does not pose a problem.
> > 
> > Change ext4_es_try_to_merge_left() to return whichever extent_status
> > should be recorded in tree->cache_es.  Remove cache_es update from
> > both of them, leaving that to ext4_es_insert_extent()'s out label.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hugh, thanks for finding this bug!
> 
> Zheng, you were going to send me an updated patch series; can you take
> care of merging this patch into your patch series (and crediting Hugh
> with a Signed-off-by as appropriate)?

Yeah, thanks for fixing it, although I have fixed this problem in my new
patch set.  I will add a Signed-off-by into the patch.

Regards,
Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux