2012/9/26 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:51:01AM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: > > Why? If it isn't the same as the previous one, it will be updated. If > > it is the same, it don't need to be updated. I don't see what your mean > > here. > > Oh, I see; sorry, I was just looking at the patch and not the file > with the changes in context. I thought you were updating the backup > descriptors after modifying the last block group in the meta_bg group, > but that was my confusion. > > Yes, your patch looks good and I will apply it, thanks!! > > - Ted Hi Ted, Is this patch should be merged with your previous patches about meta_bg online resize on 9/14? [PATCH 2/9] avoid duplicate writes of the backup bg descriptor blocks [PATCH 5/9] add online resizing support for meta_bg and 64-bit file systems Regards, Kevin Liao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
