[PATCH 20/21 v5] tests: change result in f_bad_disconnected_inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx>

In this test, inode flag is some random data, and when we apply inline data
patch set we should need to handle it.

Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1 |    9 +++++++++
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1 b/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1
index 11862f6..9f9b447 100644
--- a/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1
+++ b/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1
@@ -2,9 +2,18 @@ Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
 Inode 1 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support.
 Clear? yes
 
+Inode 14 has INLINE_DATA_FL flag on filesystem without inline data support.
+Clear? yes
+
+Inode 15 has INLINE_DATA_FL flag on filesystem without inline data support.
+Clear? yes
+
 Inode 15 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support.
 Clear? yes
 
+Inode 16 has INLINE_DATA_FL flag on filesystem without inline data support.
+Clear? yes
+
 Inode 16 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support.
 Clear? yes
 
-- 
1.7.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux