Re: [PATCH 7/7] ext4: serialize truncate with owerwrite DIO workers V2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 09:27:14PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Jan Kara have spotted interesting issue:
> There are  potential data corruption issue with  direct IO overwrites
> racing with truncate:
>  Like:
>   dio write                      truncate_task
>   ->ext4_ext_direct_IO
>    ->overwrite == 1
>     ->down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
>     ->mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>                                ->ext4_setattr()
>                                 ->inode_dio_wait()
>                                 ->truncate_setsize()
>                                 ->ext4_truncate()
>                                  ->down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
>     ->__blockdev_direct_IO
>      ->ext4_get_block
>      ->submit_io()
>     ->up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
>                                  # truncate data blocks, allocate them to
>                                  # other inode - bad stuff happens because
>                                  # dio is still in flight.
> 
> In order to serialize with truncate dio worker should grab extra i_dio_count
> reference before drop i_mutex.
> 
> Changes agains V1:
> - wake up dio waiters before i_mutex.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Dmitry,

Indeed there is a data corruption.  This patch looks good to me.  You
can add:
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx>

Regards,
Zheng

> ---
>  fs/ext4/inode.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index a850026..c5c4f9d 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3014,6 +3014,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_ext_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb,
>  		overwrite = *((int *)iocb->private);
>  
>  		if (overwrite) {
> +			atomic_inc(&inode->i_dio_count);
>  			down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
>  			mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>  		}
> @@ -3111,6 +3112,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_ext_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb,
>  	retake_lock:
>  		/* take i_mutex locking again if we do a ovewrite dio */
>  		if (overwrite) {
> +			inode_dio_done(inode);
>  			up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
>  			mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
>  		}
> -- 
> 1.7.7.6
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux