On 9/11/12 1:06 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:07:14PM -0500, Terry wrote: >> >> RHEL 6.3 with kernel 2.6.32-279.5.2.el6.x86_64 > > I'll let Eric or Lukas comment, but as far as I know the ext4 in the > RHEL 6 kernels has been quite stable (there are a lot of bug fixes > that have been backported to the RHEL 6 kernel, and while it doesn't > have some of the newer ext4 features, it doesn't have any of the more > exciting bugs that might come with the newer features :-). > > So I really would strongly suspect the SAN or the SAN-attached storage > as being flaky, causing the file system corruptions which is leading > to the kernel and e2fsck complaining. Right, ext4 is default in RHEL6 and well tended. We'll let support look at the case, and see what's going on. But I'd certainly troubleshoot the san as well, esp. to be sure HA is set up properly and not mounting it twice on 2 nodes etc. -Eric > Regards, > > - Ted > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
