Re: [PATCH V3] xfstests: make 275 pass

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:56:38PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 1/25/12 3:13 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Ok, this is a significant rework of 275, which made too many
> > assumptions about details of space usage and failed on several
> > filesystems (it passed on xfs, but only by accident).
> > 
> > This new version tries to leave about 256k free, then tries
> > a single 1M IO, and fails only if 0 bytes are written.
> > 
> > It also sends a lot more to $seq.full for debugging on failure
> > and fixes a few other stylistic things.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> Poor Zach ran into this one again.  Can I get a review of this
> version, and I'll merge it if it looks good?

Looks OK.

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux