On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:36:00AM -0400, Luk?? Czerner wrote: > However if we would want to keep ->invalidatepage_range() and > ->invalidatepage() completely separate then we would have to have > separate truncate_inode_pages_range() and truncate_pagecache_range() > as well for the separation to actually matter. And IMO this would be > much worse... What's the problem with simply changing the ->invalidatepage prototype to always pass the range and updating all instances for it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
