On 09/03/2012 11:39 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:14:19AM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: >> Hi Ted, >> As the corresponding kernel change has been merged, can this patch be >> merged to the e2fsporgs also? > > Hi Tao, > > I folded your change into the metadata checksum patches before I > applied them to the next branch (and which is now included in the > master branch). So if you use the master/next branch, it should be > fully in sync with the kernel implementation of metadata checksum. > This was along with a number of other cleanups that I did to collapse > related patches before they got fully applied into e2fsprogs. oh, yeah, I found it after I sent this e-mail. > > I have run xfstests with metadata checksum enabled in the kernel with > the development branch of e2fsprogs, and it passes, so I'm fairly > confident they are in sync. cool. I will use it+inline_data to test the new inline data kernel. > > One of the questions that we should consider in the near future is > when to cut a e2fsprogs 1.43 release. Things which we might want to > consider adding before we cut 1.43 include the changes to fully > support online resize for 64-bit file systems, and possibly the inline > data patches, if we are confident in the e2fsprogs changes and that > the format of inline data is ready to be cast into concrete. Sure, I have finished the new inline data patches(your suggestion of the new "..") and run the xfstests on it. Hope the patch set can be sent this week. Thanks Tao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
