Re: du -s src is a lot slower on SSD than spinning disk in the same laptop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/01/12 07:30, Marc MERLIN wrote:
2) Then I put a crucial 256 C300 SSD (the replacement for the one I had that just died and killed all my data), and du took 0.3 seconds on both my old and new thinkpads.


What does FIO say on your Samsung 830 SSD, 4k random reads?
Last time I checked online benchmarks Samsung 830 had very good 4k random reads, but it's difficult to find online benchmarks for incompressible data (which fio rightly uses btw)

multithreded test:
vi fiotest_mt.fio
        [random-read]
        rw=randread
        numjobs=20
        thread
        iodepth=10
        group_reporting
        blocksize=4k
        size=512m
        directory=/mnt/<yourmountpoint>
        end_fsync=1
        runtime=10

and single threaded (more important here):
vi fiotest_st.fio
        [random-read]
        rw=randread
        numjobs=1
        thread
        iodepth=1
        group_reporting
        blocksize=4k
        size=4g
        directory=/mnt/<yourmountpoint>
        end_fsync=1
        runtime=10


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux