On 7/26/12 4:24 AM, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:05:28 -0500
>> From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [PATCH] jbd2: don't write superblock when unmounting an ro filesystem
>>
>> This sequence:
>>
>> # truncate --size=65536 fsfile
>> # losetup --offset 65536 /dev/loop0 fsfile
>> # mkfs.ext4 /dev/loop0
>> # losetup -d /dev/loop0
>> # mount -o loop,ro,offset=65536 fsfile mnt/
>> # umount mnt
>> # dmesg | tail
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> I am having hard time understanding what the sequence should be
> doing. I actually can not reproduce it, because I can not create the
> file system on such loop device because it seems like the size of
> /dev/loop0 is zero, which makes sense considering that you set
> offset to 65536 in the 65536 sized file.
sorry, that must have been a cut & paste error. :(
The offset was leftover from trying to match the original reporter's case. This simpler test shows the same problem:
1014 truncate --size=2g fsfile
1015 mkfs.ext4 fsfile
1016 mount -o loop,ro fsfile mnt
1017 umount mnt
1018 dmesg | tail
[ 417.631105] EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
[ 417.639183] SELinux: initialized (dev loop0, type ext4), uses xattr
[ 420.903970] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 262144
[ 420.910448] lost page write due to I/O error on loop0
[ 420.915662] JBD2: Error -5 detected when updating journal superblock for loop0-8.
> Also, is the use of lo device really needed ? We can create the file
> system on the file itself right ? Moreover, when I do that I can see
> that the journal is not created because the device (file) is too
> small, maybe it have something to do with the problem ?
>
> Anyway, maybe I am missing something, but I do not understand what
> kind of problem are you reproducing there.
>
> -Lukas
>
>>
>> results in an IO error when unmounting the RO filesystem:
>>
>> [ 312.386074] SELinux: initialized (dev loop1, type ext4), uses xattr
>> [ 318.020828] Buffer I/O error on device loop1, logical block 196608
>> [ 318.027024] lost page write due to I/O error on loop1
>> [ 318.032088] JBD2: Error -5 detected when updating journal superblock for loop1-8.
>>
>> This behavior changed with:
>>
>> commit 24bcc89c7e7c64982e6192b4952a0a92379fc341
>> Author: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue Mar 13 15:41:04 2012 -0400
>>
>> jbd2: split updating of journal superblock and marking journal empty
>>
>> which lost some of the magic in jbd2_journal_update_superblock() which
>> used to test for a journal with no outstanding transactions.
>>
>> I'm not sure if the following is quite the right approach, but it fixes
>> it for me.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> p.s. no idea why this only happens if I use a loop device with an offset!
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> index e9a3c4c..987ec76 100644
>> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> @@ -1354,6 +1354,11 @@ static void jbd2_mark_journal_empty(journal_t *journal)
>>
>> BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex));
>> read_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
>> + /* Is it already empty? */
>> + if (sb->s_start == 0) {
>> + read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> jbd_debug(1, "JBD2: Marking journal as empty (seq %d)\n",
>> journal->j_tail_sequence);
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
