On Jun 3, 2012, at 08:23 , Jeff Liu wrote: > Hi Kirill, > > On 06/02/2012 11:21 PM, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > >>>>>> >>>>>> Not having looked closely at the original patchset, let me ask - is this >>>>>> feature going to be a freebie with Eric's usernamespace patches? >>>>> >>>>> It we can reach a consensus to bind quota on mount namespace for >>>>> container or other things maybe. >>>> >>>> 1. OpenVZ doesn't use mount namespaces and still has quotas per container. >>> >>> AFAICS, OpenVZ has self-released quota tools to supply this feature. >> >> but standard quota tools work inside container w/o any modifications. >> This is very important for us, cause we run unmodified distros inside. > > Yes, am agree. > I can work out a new patches regarding quota tools based on mount namespace w/o any modification. Jeff, why do you need fs namespace for quotas? OpenVZ works w/o it. It sounds as too strict use case limitation. Or do I understand your patchset description wrong? Thanks, Kirill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
