On Thu 24-05-12 11:41:57, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On 2012-05-24, at 11:00 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > If ext3_setup_super() fails i.e. due to a too-high revision, > > the error is logged in dmesg but the fs is not mounted RO as > > indicated. > > > > Tested by: > > > > # mkfs.ext3 -r 4 /dev/sdb6 > > # mount /dev/sdb6 /mnt/test > > # dmesg | grep "too high" > > [164152.114551] EXT3-fs (sdb6): error: revision level too high, forcing read-only mode > > # grep sdb6 /proc/mounts > > /dev/sdb6 /mnt/test2 ext3 rw,seclabel,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 > > ^^ > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! Merged to my tree. Honza > > --- > > > > diff --git a/fs/ext3/super.c b/fs/ext3/super.c > > index cf0b592..fef7af2 100644 > > --- a/fs/ext3/super.c > > +++ b/fs/ext3/super.c > > @@ -2043,7 +2043,8 @@ static int ext3_fill_super (struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) > > goto failed_mount3; > > } > > > > - ext3_setup_super (sb, es, sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY); > > + if (ext3_setup_super(sb, es, sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) > > + sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY; > > I was wondering if this should be: > > sb->s_flags |= ext3_setup_super(...) > > but that might be over-thinking things. > > > EXT3_SB(sb)->s_mount_state |= EXT3_ORPHAN_FS; > > ext3_orphan_cleanup(sb, es); > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > Cheers, Andreas > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html