ping? The 2nd patch of the series fixes a bug which I meet again when testing 64bit feature. Yongqiang. On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > o_blocks_count should not be changed, becasuse it is used later when > reporting old blocks count in debug mode. > > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/ext4/resize.c | 3 +-- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c > index 59fa0be..601fea1 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c > @@ -1654,8 +1654,7 @@ int ext4_resize_fs(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t n_blocks_count) > es->s_log_groups_per_flex) > flexbg_size = 1 << es->s_log_groups_per_flex; > > - o_blocks_count = ext4_blocks_count(es); > - if (o_blocks_count == n_blocks_count) > + if (ext4_blocks_count(es) == n_blocks_count) > goto out; > > flex_gd = alloc_flex_gd(flexbg_size); > -- > 1.7.5.1 > -- Best Wishes Yongqiang Yang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
