-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 4/6/12 12:47 PM, Sami Liedes wrote: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 12:31:25PM -0700, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> However, there seems to be some unstated (?) naming convention about foo_bmap >> (for 64-bit bitmaps) vs. foo_bitmap (for 32-bit bitmaps), and "bitmap2" >> functions which seem to take 64-bit args, etc. I'm not sure if this new >> function needs to follow similar conventions... > > I guess... I thought I had figured those out when I sent the patch, > but I'm not so sure anymore :-) > >> My patch is probably overkill, so I won't bother to send it unless Ted >> thinks something like that is necessary. Documenting the api preservation >> framework for 64-bit bitmaps would be really helpful, I think. > > Yeah, I'm sorry it took me a while to look at this and for causing you > extra work. No worries, I could have waited, too ;) Thanks! - -Eric > Sami -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPf0jAAAoJECCuFpLhPd7g2V8P/Rdmakt3hb1mh0C7eu01Cpxw X16f5Axzhsn0c0bfZsKeEZLB6bM+5TYdlARXATxfnVEZ/upbyCsF6bqZ0I5JxHj5 wTRuB7pwl8E+7vBANOu7aI7YT1Vb0eM2i3zIRONeqkYYYbRGllKeUPCdibnL2T5+ ybiAp2tXLR665LYtt0xcHVQ63L0NfYiditmpoMpxWKNfbu4OGhnpTw6bouzzdg1f KeXQkMdd26oIl8myrp/zkuHCUtja9aSmv4KrcMcxOuFyCqCuyrQpwDx78fmKpnn8 njy/dqI2QY9c/FmScYcXyAQ6/SJ2gkzjm60dkLT8DvPYLky0ytdQQ3JeFh/kBZX9 iGnRSj+fPjujVtzG73x5d5Q8ayzr6jGR94Vm/krvBJ4Yz5GBJkcuR16/8Lmze8au oKbaKx4PrvuRqD4PEKzmfkUpVFK0GDbXkKgG0wycU/qaFa8hrTrjIo3web3wNbUc lZExrKB4Pazu65xrQHQih1uENzlJlC1vkhi99oqnrRDmc4/bvuprp//X9SxboGV+ nglwMEEFL7djPM4GSUMWEFz3qTDLZIXqjPV9XfJJvk6G62BbOHn2Q5YfIsyjNQOx Wr26EkiGui5OXRAAJ9EYdqtSjip1CPyM05CibOQJeZLDZREmchgJKE0PMcLdWziV y0l4cQNDitg/8ruuBMKk =jMuN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
