On 04/02/2012 05:45 PM, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On 04/02/2012 01:42 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:43:45AM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote: >>> use the generic .read_iter and .write_iter functions >> >> Potentially silly question --- why not use NULL pointer to mean >> generic_file_read_iter and generic_file_write_iter? Then you won't >> have to patch a bunch of file systems to add the generic .read_iter >> and .write_iter? > > I'm not very confident that generic_file_read_iter and > generic_file_write_iter will work for every filesystem that I haven't > yet touched. It should work if they use generic_aio_read and _write, but > some have their own versions of those. In fact, I just realized a big oversight on my part in that I have ext4 calling generic_file_write_iter(), when in fact, it should be doing the equivalent of ext4_file_write(). If been chasing a bug assuming that ext4 called generic_aio_write(). Sometimes I miss the obvious. > > Shaggy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
