From: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
If we hit a condition where we have allocated metadata blocks that
were not appropriately reserved, we risk underflow of
ei->i_reserved_meta_blocks. In turn, this can throw
sbi->s_dirtyclusters_counter significantly out of whack and undermine
the nondelalloc fallback logic in ext4_nonda_switch(). Warn if this
occurs and fix up the counter to handle only what we've reserved.
This condition is reproduced by xfstests 270 against ext2 with
delalloc enabled.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 9 +++++++++
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index c77b0bd..b58845c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -279,6 +279,15 @@ void ext4_da_update_reserve_space(struct inode *inode,
used = ei->i_reserved_data_blocks;
}
+ if (unlikely(ei->i_allocated_meta_blocks > ei->i_reserved_meta_blocks)) {
+ ext4_msg(inode->i_sb, KERN_NOTICE, "%s: ino %lu, allocated %d "
+ "with only %d reserved metadata blocks\n", __func__,
+ inode->i_ino, ei->i_allocated_meta_blocks,
+ ei->i_reserved_meta_blocks);
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ ei->i_allocated_meta_blocks = ei->i_reserved_meta_blocks;
+ }
+
/* Update per-inode reservations */
ei->i_reserved_data_blocks -= used;
ei->i_reserved_meta_blocks -= ei->i_allocated_meta_blocks;
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
