[PATCH 2/2] e2fsprogs tests: fix f_bad_disconnected_inode e2fsck output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Since we removed EOFBLOCKS_FL flag handling, we have to fix the
f_bad_disconnected_inode test so that e2fsck output correspond with the
new version of the code where we do not check for the EOFBLOCKS_FL flag
at all.

Simply remove EOFBLOCKS_FL flag warnings from expect.1 e2fsck output.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1 |    9 ---------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1 b/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1
index d3920e3..11862f6 100644
--- a/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1
+++ b/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1
@@ -2,21 +2,12 @@ Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
 Inode 1 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support.
 Clear? yes
 
-Inode 9 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 0, lblk -1)
-Clear? yes
-
-Inode 10 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 0, lblk -1)
-Clear? yes
-
 Inode 15 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support.
 Clear? yes
 
 Inode 16 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support.
 Clear? yes
 
-Inode 13 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 0, lblk -1)
-Clear? yes
-
 Pass 2: Checking directory structure
 Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
 /lost+found not found.  Create? yes
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux