On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 17:46 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 03/19/2012 05:25 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 00:09 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: > >> One evidence that this patch is noise is that it doesn't apply cleanly > >> just on top of my current patch set that I plan to send to Linus. > > It's more evident that you don't make > > public your own internal patch queue > > quickly enough than anything else. > Please stop repeating that shit. I already explained you the reasons. A > couple of weeks ago. shrug. I don't quite understand your comment on this subject as git log -i --grep=slaby fs/ext4 doesn't show your name. As far as I can tell, your "reasons" as you explained it is that you just do not like whitespace or style changes. Ted seems to tend to defer changes to ext4. And in this case, Ted applied other patches before mine. The issues at hand are simply normal patch conflict resolution and taste. Ted's free to do what he wants with patches he receives. Accept/reject/ridicule/ignore/defer, etc... Whatever, it doesn't bother me. My patch applies cleanly on -next (ext4 #dev) as of the date I sent it. I can not do more than that except to resend it after resolving the conflicts. I see no real good reason to do that currently. There are no patches from you for ext4 between the patch I sent and now. cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
