On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:00:32PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.c b/e2fsck/problem.c
> index d910629..ad6887e 100644
> --- a/e2fsck/problem.c
> +++ b/e2fsck/problem.c
> @@ -961,6 +961,21 @@ static struct e2fsck_problem problem_table[] = {
> "extent\n\t(logical @b %c, @n physical @b %b, len %N)\n"),
> PROMPT_FIX, 0 },
>
> + /* Extended attribute block checksum for inode does not match. */
> + { PR_1_EA_BLOCK_CSUM_INVALID,
> + N_("Extended attribute @a @b %b checksum for @i %i does not "
> + "match. "),
> + PROMPT_CLEAR, 0 },
> +
> + /*
> + * Extended attribute block passes checks, but checksum for inode does
> + * not match.
> + */
> + { PR_1_EA_BLOCK_CSUM_INVALID,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This should be PR_1_EA_BLOCK_ONLY_CSUM_INVALID. This was discovered
again via the tst_problem unit test in the e2fsprogs regression test
suite:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../lib DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=../lib ./tst_problem
*** Duplicate in problem table:
curr code = 0x0001006a: Extended attribute @a @b %b passes checks, but checksum for @i %i does not match.
*** prev code = 0x0001006a: Extended attribute @a @b %b checksum for @i %i does not match.
*** This is a fatal programming error in e2fsck
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
