Re: mkfs.ext4 vs. e2fsck discard oddities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/9/2012 3:59 AM, Lukas Czerner wrote:
Why would we try to check UNINIT groups with valid descriptor checksums
? I think that this problem will be solved with BLOCK_DISCARDED flag as
we discussed with Ted in another thread. No need to have yet another
option so it is win-win :)

Because not skipping a specific action on an uninitialized group ( discard ) is a specific case of the more general form of not skipping uninitialized groups. I thought that it might sometimes be useful to actually verify the group is correct instead of trusting the uninit flag, especially if you are about to discard it. Also any other things that are added in the future and skipped for uninit groups would not need yet another flag to specifically not skip that action, since it will be covered by the more general flag already.

Also the way the code was structured it looked like it would be much simpler to bypass the skip and do the full check of the uninit group than to modify it to discard the group even though checking it was skipped.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux