On Fri 02-03-12 14:32:15, Ted Tso wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 09:26:51AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > It would be interesting to have a project where someone added > fallocate() support into libelf, and then added some hueristics into > ext4 so that if a file is fallocated to a precise size, or if the file > is fully written and closed before writeback begins, that we use this > to more efficiently pack the space used by the files by the block > allocator. This is a place where I would not be surprised that XFS > has some better code to avoid accelerated file system aging, and where > we could do better with ext4 with some development effort. AFAIK XFS people actually prefer that applications let them do their work using delayed allocation and do not interfere with fallocate(2) calls. The problem they have with fallocate(2) is that it forces you to allocate blocks while with delayed allocation you can make the decision about allocation later. So for small files which completely fit into pagecache before they get pushed out by writeback, they can make better decisions from delayed allocation. Just dumping my memory from some other thread... Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
