On Fri 02-03-12 13:11:57, Lukas Czerner wrote: > Currently if the range to trim is too small, for example on 1K fs > the request to trim the first block, then the 'range->len' is not set > reporting wrong number of discarded block to the caller. > > Fix this by always setting the 'range->len' before we return. Note that > when there is a failure (-EINVAL) caller can not depend on 'range->len' > being set properly. Looks good. You can add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Honza > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: nothing changed > > fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > index f20688e..8f817f2 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > @@ -5092,11 +5092,11 @@ int ext4_trim_fs(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range) > */ > first_cluster = 0; > } > - range->len = trimmed * sb->s_blocksize; > > if (!ret) > atomic_set(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_last_trim_minblks, minlen); > > out: > + range->len = trimmed * sb->s_blocksize; > return ret; > } > -- > 1.7.4.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html