The EXT4_MB_BITMAP and EXT4_MB_BUDDY macros obfuscate more than they
provide any abstraction. So remove them.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
fs/ext4/mballoc.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 8e01214..7e6fab9 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static void *mb_find_buddy(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, int order, int *max)
{
char *bb;
- BUG_ON(EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b) == EXT4_MB_BUDDY(e4b));
+ BUG_ON(e4b->bd_bitmap == e4b->bd_buddy);
BUG_ON(max == NULL);
if (order > e4b->bd_blkbits + 1) {
@@ -438,10 +438,10 @@ static void *mb_find_buddy(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, int order, int *max)
/* at order 0 we see each particular block */
if (order == 0) {
*max = 1 << (e4b->bd_blkbits + 3);
- return EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b);
+ return e4b->bd_bitmap;
}
- bb = EXT4_MB_BUDDY(e4b) + EXT4_SB(e4b->bd_sb)->s_mb_offsets[order];
+ bb = e4b->bd_buddy + EXT4_SB(e4b->bd_sb)->s_mb_offsets[order];
*max = EXT4_SB(e4b->bd_sb)->s_mb_maxs[order];
return bb;
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static int __mb_check_buddy(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, char *file,
for (j = 0; j < (1 << order); j++) {
k = (i * (1 << order)) + j;
MB_CHECK_ASSERT(
- !mb_test_bit(k, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b)));
+ !mb_test_bit(k, e4b->bd_bitmap));
}
count++;
}
@@ -1203,10 +1203,10 @@ static int mb_find_order_for_block(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, int block)
int order = 1;
void *bb;
- BUG_ON(EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b) == EXT4_MB_BUDDY(e4b));
+ BUG_ON(e4b->bd_bitmap == e4b->bd_buddy);
BUG_ON(block >= (1 << (e4b->bd_blkbits + 3)));
- bb = EXT4_MB_BUDDY(e4b);
+ bb = e4b->bd_buddy;
while (order <= e4b->bd_blkbits + 1) {
block = block >> 1;
if (!mb_test_bit(block, bb)) {
@@ -1276,9 +1276,9 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
/* let's maintain fragments counter */
if (first != 0)
- block = !mb_test_bit(first - 1, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b));
+ block = !mb_test_bit(first - 1, e4b->bd_bitmap);
if (first + count < EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_maxs[0])
- max = !mb_test_bit(first + count, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b));
+ max = !mb_test_bit(first + count, e4b->bd_bitmap);
if (block && max)
e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments--;
else if (!block && !max)
@@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
block = first++;
order = 0;
- if (!mb_test_bit(block, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b))) {
+ if (!mb_test_bit(block, e4b->bd_bitmap)) {
ext4_fsblk_t blocknr;
blocknr = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, e4b->bd_group);
@@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
"freeing already freed block "
"(bit %u)", block);
}
- mb_clear_bit(block, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b));
+ mb_clear_bit(block, e4b->bd_bitmap);
e4b->bd_info->bb_counters[order]++;
/* start of the buddy */
@@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ static int mb_find_extent(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, int order, int block,
break;
next = (block + 1) * (1 << order);
- if (mb_test_bit(next, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b)))
+ if (mb_test_bit(next, e4b->bd_bitmap))
break;
order = mb_find_order_for_block(e4b, next);
@@ -1419,9 +1419,9 @@ static int mb_mark_used(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct ext4_free_extent *ex)
/* let's maintain fragments counter */
if (start != 0)
- mlen = !mb_test_bit(start - 1, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b));
+ mlen = !mb_test_bit(start - 1, e4b->bd_bitmap);
if (start + len < EXT4_SB(e4b->bd_sb)->s_mb_maxs[0])
- max = !mb_test_bit(start + len, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b));
+ max = !mb_test_bit(start + len, e4b->bd_bitmap);
if (mlen && max)
e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments++;
else if (!mlen && !max)
@@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ static int mb_mark_used(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct ext4_free_extent *ex)
}
mb_set_largest_free_order(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_info);
- ext4_set_bits(EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b), ex->fe_start, len0);
+ ext4_set_bits(e4b->bd_bitmap, ex->fe_start, len0);
mb_check_buddy(e4b);
return ret;
@@ -1763,7 +1763,7 @@ void ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
struct ext4_buddy *e4b)
{
struct super_block *sb = ac->ac_sb;
- void *bitmap = EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b);
+ void *bitmap = e4b->bd_bitmap;
struct ext4_free_extent ex;
int i;
int free;
@@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ void ext4_mb_scan_aligned(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
{
struct super_block *sb = ac->ac_sb;
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
- void *bitmap = EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b);
+ void *bitmap = e4b->bd_bitmap;
struct ext4_free_extent ex;
ext4_fsblk_t first_group_block;
ext4_fsblk_t a;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
index 7128f46..c070618 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
@@ -212,8 +212,6 @@ struct ext4_buddy {
__u16 bd_blkbits;
ext4_group_t bd_group;
};
-#define EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b) ((e4b)->bd_bitmap)
-#define EXT4_MB_BUDDY(e4b) ((e4b)->bd_buddy)
static inline ext4_fsblk_t ext4_grp_offs_to_block(struct super_block *sb,
struct ext4_free_extent *fex)
--
1.7.9.107.g97f9a
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
