On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 03:09:09PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > calculate_minimum_resize_size() forgot to account s_first_data_block > into minimum filesystem size. Thus in case the size of filesystem was > such that the last group had the minimal size (50 blocks + metadata > overhead), the code in adjust_fs_info() decided the group is unneeded, > removed it, and in some cases the resizing then failed with ENOSPC. > > Fix the issue by properly accounting for s_first_data_block in > calculate_minimum_resize_size(). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Thanks, applied. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
