I've posted the results of some 3.2 and 3.1 ext4 scalability
measurements and comparisons on a 48 core x86-64 server at:
http://free.linux.hp.com/~enw/ext4/3.2
This includes throughput and CPU efficiency graphs for five simple
workloads, the raw data for same, plus lockstats on ext4 filesystems
with and without journals. The data have been useful in improving ext4
scalability as a function of core and thread count in the past.
For reference, ext3, xfs, and btrfs data are also included.
The most notable improvement in 3.2 is a big scalability gain for
journaled ext4 when running the large_file_creates workload. This
bisects cleanly to Wu Fengguang's IO-less balance_dirty_pages() patch
which was included in the 3.2 merge window.
(Please note that the test system's hardware and firmware configuration
has changed since my last posting, so this data set cannot be directly
compared with my older sets.)
Thanks,
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
