Re: [patch] ext4: fix race between unwritten extent conversion and truncate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu 26-01-12 15:59:11, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> The following comment in ext4_end_io_dio caught my attention:
>> 
>> 	/* XXX: probably should move into the real I/O completion handler */
>>         inode_dio_done(inode);
>> 
>> The truncate code takes i_mutex, then calls inode_dio_wait.  Because the
>> ext4 code path above will end up dropping the mutex before it is
>> reacquired by the worker thread that does the extent conversion, it
>> seems to me that the truncate can happen out of order.  Jan Kara
>> mentioned that this might result in extra journal I/O, which isn't nice,
>   Funny misunderstanding ;) I meant we will complain to system log with error
> messages / WARN_ON.

Heh.  Ted, let me know if I need to repost to fix that up...

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux