On December 30 Eric Sanden wrote: > On 12/28/11 10:09 AM, markk@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>... >> What I expected to happen is that if fallocate() fails due to lack of >> disk >> space, no space is allocated, i.e. either nothing happens or the >> allocation succeeds. >> >> What actually seems to happen is that all remaining space in the >> partition >> gets allocated to the file. (Thus risking that other programs will fail >> due to lack of disk space until the file is deleted.) > > To be honest, I'm not sure how it is _supposed_ to work, but I see this > same behavior with fallocate, with posix_fallocate calling fallocate, and > with > posix_fallocate simply writing out data via glibc, (I tested several of > those > combinations on different filesystems, anyway). > > Even the posix_fallocate spec doesn't say what is supposed to happen to > space > allocated prior to failure, but the implementations seem fairly > consistent. > Seems fair to say that callers should check error returns, and unlink or > truncate on error as needed. Has anyone tested how posix_fallocate() handles ENOSPC on non-Linux systems (Solaris, BSD etc.)? Though the documentation doesn't specifically state what happens on an out-of-disk-space condition, I would have assumed that the filesystem should either check for sufficient space before allocating any, or back out/undo any partial allocation on failure. The current leave-the-disk-full behaviour is definitely not ideal IMHO. The filesystem is much better placed than the calling program to revert any changes. If a program created a non-sparse file and wanted to allocate a region beyond its current end, failure of fallocate() is fairly simple to recover from; just truncate the file. But in the general case it's not possible (or at least very tricky) to properly recover when fallocate() fails due to insufficient disk space... Suppose the fallocate program were modified to properly restore the file state when fallocate() returns ENOSPC. Here's what it would need to do: - Open the file. - Build a map of the holes in the file. You could use SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_END, but I don't think that's sufficient to tell if the file has space allocated beyond its apparent length (i.e. if fallocate() was previously used with FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE). So you'd probably need to use fiemap (which is Linux-specific and quite complicated). - Call fallocate() with the user-specified offset and length. If it returns ENOSPC, then: - loop through the list of holes, calling fallocate() with FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE to restore any holes which were in the fallocated region (between offset and offset+length-1 bytes). That's only possible if the user's kernel and filesystem are recent enough to support hole punching. - If offset+length was greater than the file's original size, ftruncate() to its original length. - If there was originally space allocated past the end of the file, call fallocate() with FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE to restore the allocation. A possible real-world example could be a (sparse) virtual machine hard disk image which the user wants to make non-sparse. He uses the fallocate command to fully allocate its entire size, not realising there is insufficient disk space. So fallocate() fails and the disk is full. If the user doesn't have a program to scan a file and punch holes in the all-zero regions (assuming the kernel/filesystem support hole punching) the only way to recover would be to copy the image file to another partition (cp --sparse=always) and back again. It would be much simpler/easier if the filesystem could handle running out of disk space; the filesystem can keep a list of allocated regions and on running out can just free them again before returning ENOSPC. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html