On 12/09/2011 06:44 AM, Yongqiang Yang wrote:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Andy Whitcroft<apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 06:12:35PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:39:55AM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
[...]
[PATCH 1/2] ext4: let mpage_submit_io works well when blocksize< pagesize
[PATCH 2/2] ext4: let ext4_discard_partial_buffers handle pages without
[PATCH 1/2] ext4: remove a wrong BUG_ON in ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized
[PATCH 2/2] ext4: let ext4_bio_write_page handle EOF correctly
[...]
Only once, before the fixes, did I ever see an unexplained EINVAL
(from cp), like Andy reports: I'm very hopeful his case is fixed too.
Yes I have reverted my fix and applied all four of these patches (above).
I have just completed a 100 iteration run of my test case without failure.
This would typically fail in the first iteration 90% of the time and
never survived more than two iterations.
I am comfortable saying they resolve my issue.
Are we likely to see these fixes in a 3.2-rcN or will they be going to
stable?
All patches will go to 3.2-rcN and the later 2 patches would go to
stable too, I think.
Yongqiang.
Sounds good, its lasted 24hrs now for me so I think it's safe to stop
it. Thx!
Allison Henderson
-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
