>>>>> Ted Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes: […] > Yeah, the resize inode is a special case. It is specially > constructed to reserve space for new block group descriptor blocks > when doing an online resize. I would suggest for your purposes that > you _not_ support the online-resizable file system feature, as it's > unneeded complexity (from what I understand of what you're going to > be doing with the file system). I don't seem to understand why such a support would require a specific handling of the resizable filesystems (other than that EXT2_RESIZE_INO is to be ignored by e2dis.) As I currently have no means of Ext2+ FS non-payload parts extraction, I'm going to rely on e2image(8). Like: # tar -C / -jcf image.files.tar.bz2 mnt/ $ /sbin/e2image -r image.ext2 image.e2image $ e2dis image.index < image.ext2 Then, the image could be restored with: $ tar -jxf image.files.tar.bz2 $ find mnt/ -type f -print0 \ | (cat < image.e2image && imrt image.index) \ > image.ext2 (Note that imrt is going to lseek(2) its stdout.) That way, I assume that the resize inode is going to be preserved thanks to e2image. The point of the procedure above is that instead of passing a complete .tar.bz2 archive with all the files, only the new files may be passed, should it be necessary to produce a new version of the image (like passing a diff instead of the whole source.) Moreover, for system images, most of the files would likely to be available from the regular OS packages' repositories. > P.S. The code to create the reserved inode can be found in > lib/ext2fs/res_gdt.c, in ext2fs_create_resize_inode(). ACK. Thanks. -- FSF associate member #7257 Coming soon: Software Freedom Day http://mail.sf-day.org/lists/listinfo/ planning-ru (ru), sfd-discuss (en) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html