Thanks for your point. I will remake this patch. 2011/8/30 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > On Tue 30-08-11 17:53:58, Li Haifeng wrote: > > The function iget referred by the comment is replaced by ext2_iget . > > And the ext2_read_inode() is not exist, the ext2_iget is "neater". So > > the comment is fixed here. > > > > Signed-off-by: Li Haifeng <omycle@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/ext2/super.c | 6 ++---- > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c > > index 1dd62ed..994ced3 100644 > > --- a/fs/ext2/super.c > > +++ b/fs/ext2/super.c > > @@ -327,10 +327,8 @@ static struct inode *ext2_nfs_get_inode(struct > > super_block *sb, > > if (ino > le32_to_cpu(EXT2_SB(sb)->s_es->s_inodes_count)) > > return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE); > > > > - /* iget isn't really right if the inode is currently unallocated!! > > - * ext2_read_inode currently does appropriate checks, but > > - * it might be "neater" to call ext2_get_inode first and check > > - * if the inode is valid..... > > + /* > > + * ext2_iget isn't really right if the inode is currently unallocated!! > OK, but we should keep there a note that ext2_iget() does appropriate > checks to handle stale inodes. > > Honza > > */ > > inode = ext2_iget(sb, ino); > > if (IS_ERR(inode)) > > -- > > 1.7.4.1 > -- > Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html