Re: question about punch hole

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/25/2011 07:53 PM, Yongqiang Yang wrote:
Hi Allison,

Currently, punch hole flushes all pages to disk and releases pages in
page cache, and then calls ext4_ext_map_blocks.

Assume that if a new page in the punching's range is mapped after
releasing pages and before down_write i_data_sem,
then ext4_ext_map_blocks will release map info of the page in extent
tree.  However, up layers does not know this, and they think the page
is mapped.

I can not find how punch hole handle the situation above.  Could you
shed a light on it?


Hi Yongqiang

This is a really good question and at the moment Im still looking into it. :) The calling sequence in punch hole was modeled after truncate, which also only locks i_data_sem when modifying the extent tree. ext4_ext_map_blocks when called with the punch hole flag, only releases blocks in the extent tree, using the same routines truncate does, but it does not modify the state of the pages. Though that still does not prevent the race condition you describe, so I am still investigating it. I've found that I can catch a lot of race conditions by simply running the stress test over night, and so far I havnt had anything like this come up, but that certainly doesnt mean its not there. I will let you know what I find. Thx!

Allison Henderson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux