>>>>> Ted Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes: >>>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:25:19AM +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote: >> Apparently, e2p_blocks_count (), a ‘static’ function in >> lib/e2p/ls.c, duplicates the public ext2fs_blocks_count () one >> (lib/ext2fs/blknum.c) as of d4c0d8e5. The same holds for >> e2p_r_blocks_count () and e2p_free_blocks_count (). >> The code is, as it seems, exactly the same. >> I wonder, isn't there a problem? > That's deliberate; the goal was to make libe2p not dependent on > libext2fs, so that programs such as lsattr don't need to pull in > libext2fs. ACK. Thanks. -- FSF associate member #7257 Coming soon: Software Freedom Day http://mail.sf-day.org/lists/listinfo/ planning-ru (ru), sfd-discuss (en) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html