On Mon 15-08-11 16:21:27, Lukas Czerner wrote: > On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > On 2011-08-11, at 8:58 AM, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > >> For a long time now orlov is the default block allocator in the ext4. It > > >> performs better than the old one and no one seems to claim otherwise so > > >> we can safely drop it and make oldalloc and orlov mount option > > >> deprecated. > > >> > > >> This is a part of the effort to reduce number of ext4 options hence the > > >> test matrix. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > ping > > > > I'm OK with removing this, I don't think anyone uses it, and it has almost > > no meaning with flex_bg anyway. > > > > That said, "orlov" is also mostly meaningless with flex_bg as well, since > > there is very little real benefit/affinity from inodes being "close" to > > their data blocks. We gain far more benefit from keeping the inodes > > together than spreading them out and keeping them close to the data blocks. > > What about removing it for ext3 as well ? I can prepare a patch. OK, let's start warning the option is deprecated and will be removed from ext3. We can remove it after 2-3 releases... > Also note that there is a bug in the OLDALLOC where if there is > approximately the same number of inodes in all of the allocation groups > it might result in the state where no group has less free inode count > than the average, hence we get ENOSPC even though there is enough space > for the inode to be allocated. It is unlikely, but it is there. Fix for this would be nice. > So Ted, could you take the patch ? ext3 patches go through my tree. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
