Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: avoid redundant cache finding if flags not cantian PUNCH_OUT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:59, Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 06:45:13PM +0800, Robin Dong wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH v2] ext4: avoid redundant cache finding if flags not cantian
>
> I suspect you mean "contain" as opposed to "cantian".

The patch summary line could also use some shortening.

>> In old code, ext4 will find extent in cache first even flags does
>> not contian PUNCH_OUT, that may waste some time.
>
> Same here ("contian").

How about something along the lines of:
---------
ext4: avoid wasted extent cache lookup if !PUNCH_OUT_EXT

This patch avoids an extraneous lookup of the extent cache
in ext4_ext_map_blocks() when the flag
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PUNCH_OUT_EXT is absent.

The existing logic was performing the lookup but not making
use of the result. The patch simply reverses the order of evaluation
in the condition.

Since ext4_ext_in_cache() does not initialize newex on misses, bypassing
its invocation does not introduce any new issue in this regard.
---------

 Regards - Eric

>
> --D
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Dong <sanbai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  fs/ext4/extents.c |    4 ++--
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> index eb63c7b..fed2633 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> @@ -3358,8 +3358,8 @@ int ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>>       trace_ext4_ext_map_blocks_enter(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len, flags);
>>
>>       /* check in cache */
>> -     if (ext4_ext_in_cache(inode, map->m_lblk, &newex) &&
>> -             ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PUNCH_OUT_EXT) == 0)) {
>> +     if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PUNCH_OUT_EXT) &&
>> +             ext4_ext_in_cache(inode, map->m_lblk, &newex)) {
>>               if (!newex.ee_start_lo && !newex.ee_start_hi) {
>>                       if ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE) == 0) {
>>                               /*
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux