Re: [PATCH 0/8] remove i_alloc_sem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 20-06-11 16:15:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> i_alloc_sem has always been a bit of an odd "lock".  It's the only remaining
> rw_semaphore that can be released by a different thread than the one that
> locked it, and it's use case in the core direct I/O code is more like a
> counter given that the writers already have external serialization.
> 
> This series removes it in favour of a simpler counter scheme, thus getting
> rid of the rw_semaphore non-owner APIs as requests by Thomas, while at the
> same time shrinking the size of struct inode by 160 bytes on 64-bit systems.
> 
> The only nasty bit is that two filesystems (fat and ext4) have started
> abusing the lock for their own purposes.  I've added a new rw_semaphore
  ext4 abuse should be gone when Ted merges my rewrite of
ext4_page_mkwrite()... Ted, what happened to that patch. Should I resend
it?

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux