On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:20:42AM -0000, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> We need to take reference to the s_li_request after we take a mutex,
> because it might be freed since then, hence result in accessing old
> already freed memory. Also we should protect the whole
> ext4_remove_li_request() because ext4_li_info might be in the process of
> being freed in ext4_lazyinit_thread().
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
I've merged all four lazyinit patches into the ext4 tree, thanks.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
