Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 13:37 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 18:55 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 10:43 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > However, since you admit even you see problems, let's concentrate on
> > > fixing them rather than recriminations?
> > 
> > Yes, please. So does dropping max_order to 1 help?
> > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER is set to 3 in 2.6.39-rc7.
> 
> Just booting with max_slab_order=1 (and none of the other patches
> applied) I can still get the machine to go into kswapd at 99%, so it
> doesn't seem to make much of a difference.
> 
> Do you want me to try with the other two patches and max_slab_order=1?

OK, so patches 1 + 2 plus setting slub_max_order=1 still manages to
trigger the problem (kswapd spinning at 99%).  This is still with
PREEMPT; it's possible that non-PREEMPT might be better, so I'll try
patches 1+2+3 with PREEMPT just to see if the perturbation is caused by
it.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux