Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reduce impact to overall system of SLUB using high-order allocations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi James!

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 05:34:27PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Yes, but only once in all the testing.  With patches 1 and 2 the hang is

Weird patch 2 makes the large order allocation without ~__GFP_WAIT, so
even COMPACTION=y/n shouldn't matter anymore. Am I misreading
something Mel?

Removing ~__GFP_WAIT from patch 2 (and adding ~__GFP_REPEAT as a
correctness improvement) and setting COMPACTION=y also should work ok.

Removing ~__GFP_WAIT from patch 2 and setting COMPACTION=n is expected
not to work well.

But compaction should only make the difference if you remove
~__GFP_WAIT from patch 2.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux