We should protect reading bd_info->bb_first_free with the group lock
because otherwise we might miss some free blocks. This is not a big deal
at all, but the change to do right thing is really simple, so lets do
that.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 776d7a8..804232a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -4775,11 +4775,11 @@ ext4_trim_all_free(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group,
"information for %u", group);
return ret;
}
-
bitmap = e4b.bd_bitmap;
+
+ ext4_lock_group(sb, group);
start = (e4b.bd_info->bb_first_free > start) ?
e4b.bd_info->bb_first_free : start;
- ext4_lock_group(sb, group);
while (start < max) {
start = mb_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, max, start);
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
