Re: recursive mtime patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



  Hi,

On Mon 11-04-11 16:37:57, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Do you have an uptodate version of your recursive mtime patches?
> The only version I can find online is the original series from 2007.
  I've put latest version (against 2.6.37) to
http://beta.suse.com/private/jack/recursive_mtime/

> I am interested in the patches for indexdb-like application,
> so persistence after crash is also important for my use case.
> Your patches would require the application to perform a full
> directory scan after crash, right?
  OK, it depends. Currently, even mtime updates are not reliable (data can
be written to a file while mtime update is not yet committed).  Recursive
modification stamps have possibly larger race windows but I haven't really
tried how much (I just know that even mtime races are not that hard to
trigger if you try). So it really depends on how big reliability do you
expect and I personally don't find much value in just rescanning and
checking for mtime after a crash. Reading all the data and doing checksum
certainly has more value but at a high cost.

							Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux