Re: [RFC] exclude bitmap and 32bit bitmap cheksum fields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Sent from my iPhone

On 08/04/2011, at 11:45, Tao Ma <tm@xxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Amir,
On 04/09/2011 02:00 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
Hi Ted,

Following our conversation, here is a proposal how to squeeze:
- 32bit exclude bitmap block address
- 32bit block+exclude bitmap checksum
- 32bit inode bitmap checksum
into the reaming 8 bytes in the group descriptor.

The idea is that the 16bit persistent free inode/block counters
are redundant to the inode/block bitmap information
and are needed in 2 use cases:
1. sanity checks on fsck
2. quick load of in-memory counters

The first use case is nulled by the introduction of inode/block bitmap
checksums.
The second use case can be bypassed with no substantial penalty:
in-memory counters can be calculated on first inode/block bitmap access, when the GRP_NEED_INIT (or another) flag is set in the group_info struct,
just like their cousins, the buddy bitmap counters.

Amir.

diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h b/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h
index 0deb554..5cbaeb2 100644
--- a/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h
+++ b/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h
@@ -153,11 +153,11 @@ struct ext2_group_desc
   __u32    bg_block_bitmap;    /* Blocks bitmap block */
   __u32    bg_inode_bitmap;    /* Inodes bitmap block */
   __u32    bg_inode_table;        /* Inodes table block */
-    __u16    bg_free_blocks_count;    /* Free blocks count */
-    __u16    bg_free_inodes_count;    /* Free inodes count */
+    __u32    bg_exclude_bitmap;    /* Exclude bitmap block */
   __u16    bg_used_dirs_count;    /* Directories count */
   __u16    bg_flags;
-    __u32    bg_reserved[2];
+ __u32 bg_block_bitmap_csum; /* Blocks+exclude bitmap checksum */
+    __u32    bg_inode_bitmap_csum;    /* Inodes bitmap checksum */
   __u16    bg_itable_unused;    /* Unused inodes count */
__u16 bg_checksum; /* crc16(s_uuid+grouo_num +group_desc)*/
};
@@ -170,18 +170,17 @@ struct ext4_group_desc
   __u32    bg_block_bitmap;    /* Blocks bitmap block */
   __u32    bg_inode_bitmap;    /* Inodes bitmap block */
   __u32    bg_inode_table;        /* Inodes table block */
-    __u16    bg_free_blocks_count;    /* Free blocks count */
-    __u16    bg_free_inodes_count;    /* Free inodes count */
+    __u32    bg_exclude_bitmap;    /* Exclude bitmap block */
   __u16    bg_used_dirs_count;    /* Directories count */
   __u16    bg_flags;
-    __u32    bg_reserved[2];
+ __u32 bg_block_bitmap_csum; /* Blocks+exclude bitmap checksum */
+    __u32    bg_inode_bitmap_csum;    /* Inodes bitmap checksum */
   __u16    bg_itable_unused;    /* Unused inodes count */
__u16 bg_checksum; /* crc16(s_uuid+grouo_num +group_desc)*/
   __u32    bg_block_bitmap_hi;    /* Blocks bitmap block MSB */
   __u32    bg_inode_bitmap_hi;    /* Inodes bitmap block MSB */
   __u32    bg_inode_table_hi;    /* Inodes table block MSB */
-    __u16    bg_free_blocks_count_hi;/* Free blocks count MSB */
-    __u16    bg_free_inodes_count_hi;/* Free inodes count MSB */
+    __u32    bg_exclude_bitmap;    /* Exclude bitmap block MSB */
   __u16    bg_used_dirs_count_hi;    /* Directories count MSB */
   __u16   bg_pad;
   __u32    bg_reserved2[3];
@@ -190,6 +189,7 @@ struct ext4_group_desc
#define EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT 0x0001 /* Inode table/bitmap not initialized */ #define EXT2_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT 0x0002 /* Block bitmap not initialized */ #define EXT2_BG_INODE_ZEROED 0x0004 /* On-disk itable initialized to zero */ +#define EXT2_BG_EXCLUDE_UNINIT 0x0008 /* Exclude bitmap not initialized */

/*
 * Data structures used by the directory indexing feature
@@ -751,6 +751,7 @@ struct ext2_super_block {
#define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DIR_NLINK    0x0020
#define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE    0x0040
#define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_HAS_SNAPSHOT    0x0080
+#define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_BITMAP_CSUM    0x0100
I guess this should be in FEATURE_INCOMPAT, not RO_COMPAT?
Since you have changed free_{inodes, blocks}_count to exclude_map. an
old kernel will interpret these values wrongly.
I don't think the counters matter for read only mount


Regards,
Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux