Re: Large directories and poor order correlation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/15/2011 10:33 AM, Rogier Wolff wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:01:24AM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
To try and clarify this point a bit, are you saying that applications
like tar and rsync should be patched to sort the directory by inode
number, rather than it being the job of the fs to return entries in a
good order?
IMHO, it is the job of the FS to perform well in common cases.

	Roger.


Some file systems do this well. The thread here is more focused on dealing with issues for file systems that handle this poorly :)

Ric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux