Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: Fix a BUG in mb_mark_used during trim.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:33:35PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> Actually these numbers are related to the block size of a ext4 volume.
> To be more specific, with the above number, we have
> first_block + block_len > EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP while
> block_len < EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP.
> So do you think it is generic enough for a test case in xfstests
> since now this
> tool kit is also used to test xfs and btrfs?

xfstests also allows filesystem-specific tests.  Most of the specific
tests are for xfs, but there are few for udf right now as well.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux