Yeah, it was just a standard mkfs so I doubt that option was specified. The important thing for me here was to at least let you folks know about it so that you can determine if this is significant or not. Thanks bill On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > There are a few places where we update the superblock bypassing the > journal layer. Â(For example, when we set the RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE > feature flag if it wasn't previously set). ÂThose should be cleaned > up, but it's not related to the rest of the scary-looking corruption > which you saw. ÂThe worst that might happen is specific superblock > update might get lost (i.e., the RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE feature flag) on > a crash before we commit some other superblock change to the journal. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
