Re: Proposed design for big allocation blocks for ext4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:31:40PM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 04:03:04PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> > > We could add complexity to do suballocations for directories, but KISS
> > > seems to be a much better idea for now.
> > 
> > 	Oh dear God no.
> 
> What are you saying no to?  KISS or suballocations?  :-)

	You know the answer to that ;-)  Though if you ever do smoke
some crack and design suballocations, ocfs2 will happily steal them.

Jool

-- 

"Only a life lived for others is a life worth while."
							-Albert Einstein  

			http://www.jlbec.org/
			jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux