On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Milan Broz <mbroz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/07/2011 06:45 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 10:40:47PM +0000, Matt wrote: >>> >>> So that means that the file-corruption which existed until 2.6.37-rc6 >>> and got triggered (for me) more easily via "dm crypt: scale to >>> multiple CPUs" >>> is fixed now ? >> >> Well, a patch exists for it that will be merged into 2.6.38. >> >>> That should give ext4 a nice speedup for >=2.6.38 :) >> >> I'm not going to make it be the default for 2.6.38, since it's fairly >> late in the -rc features. People who want it can explicitly enable it >> using the mount option mblk_io_submit, though. (And let me know your >> success stories! :-) I will be enabling it as the default in >> 2.6.39-rc1. > > So it was ext4 only bug in ext4_end_bio(), > dm-crypt per-cpu code was just trigger here, right? > > Milan > Hi Milan, Well, that was at least the experience that I made ext4: after Ted had disabled support for multiple page-io submission I observed no data-corruption anymore (it had only appeared on the system-partition, /home - where ext4 also is used or on my backup partitions there was also no problem as far as I can tell) XFS: no corruption observed reiserfs: I can't say for sure since I'm only using it on my /boot partition :P for other filesystems I can't say anything - I didn't use additional ones at that time Regards Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html